The hostility some encourage, violates human existence, far exceeds what would be deemed appropriate and inhibits what God intended.
Live and let live, simple, isn’t it? But that’s too simple for some to follow. Rather than encourage symbioses — they tend to prefer complication, the difficulties they often would challenge themselves to encourage. The approach is to inhibit the progression of others, with aggression and hostility. This has to be the method of choice — no other way will do, in their eyes.
And should we ask why? Let’s dwell in the excitement of boredom for awhile. Not very appealing for many, and, thus, sustainability seems a struggling conflict when they’re desperately craving anything but the healthy norm, which is require for everyone’s survival. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg, and its danger is not always apparent to many.
In some cases, selfishness and greed are the driving forces. In other cases, insecurity laced with the evil eye of jealousy perpetuate this ungodly behavior. And yet another is financial slavery, where some are unfairly paid for work done. Many may not consider this hostility, but they would be so wrong not to, which in fact is at the center of hostile inhibition and can cripple societal progression.
If for whatever reason(s) they don’t consider what they do to others, selfishly regarding their lives more important than theirs — the prevailing wind would carry a domineering and regressive society — one in which some will live while others will suffocate, eventually dying. And that unjustifiable act would stimulate cries of disappointment, a culture of stagnation, which will not cease should they continue to hurt others, disregarding them so they may live.
And if they would call that living, then what would they consider dying. That’s certainly a dreadful way to live, if others must be impeded, and even deny the right to live. As you can tell, it does not sit right with me, nor does it impress me, not even one bit… I will rebel this and will continue to rebel hostile inhibition. But more than that, I will continue to be an advocate for progression, where respect, concern for others will allow them a fair chance to flourish, just as we desire of ourselves.
Mikey St. John
Initial Nutrition Consulting Fee – $80
My initial consulting fee include discussion (where HIPAA is adhere to), protocol & 2 follow up phone calls. Fees are based on 60 minutes discussion(i.e. 1Item=60 minutes (1hour) discussion=$80
Ongoing Consultation Fee (Follow-up sessions) – $60
Ongoing Consultation Fee (Follow-up sessions) is $60 for a 60 minutes session(1hour). This includes a protocol & two follow up phone calls.
Donate Here! Thanks! Leave a small tip of $5, or more, by adjusting the number in the box. With $10 donation you get 5 minutes to ask me anything about diet & nutrition, including anti-aging nutrition used to reverse the aging process.
Enter 1 to donate $5; Enter 2 to donate $10; etc.